Jump to content

ID 61 Metagaming (MG)

Recommended Posts

Player(s) being reported: ID 61
Date of interaction reported: ‎August ‎18, ‎2019
Unix time stamp from HUD: 1566110987

Your characters name: Amir Khan

Other player(s) involved: ID 77 

Specific rule(s) broken:

9. Metagaming (MG)

  • Metagaming is the act of relaying IC information through any method not considered IC that has the potential to change current or future roleplay scenarios or using that information. 

  • Mixing IC and OOC information without any benefit is a minor MG offense. For example, a player uses IC chat to call someone by their player ID displayed above their head.

How did the player break the rule(s)?

I heard shots at parking and I went to go check it out, I was talking to ID 77 asking what happened and then this off-duty cop comes in and shoots ID 77 and aims a gun at me which kinda pissed me off as I was not involved in the situation, so I threatened him by saying "i'll fuck you up". 
Next day I start playing the game and realized I was wanted because cops came and towed my schafter v12 seen in the footage, I went to PD to ask what my charges were and they told me that I have a misdemeanor for threatening a cop, I then asked the cops if I can call an admin but there were non online at the time. In the footage I clearly had a mask on so the cop has no idea that it was me it could've been a stolen vehicle but still he pressed charges on me without even knowing that it was ME he just pressed charges on the owner of the vehicle.

Evidence of rule breach:


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not ID 77 but I was the person that added charges to your record after ID 77 spoke to me about what happend IC so I would like to chime in if you dont mind.


The next day when on patrol ID 77 mentioned you made criminal threats against him and he knew what car you were driving and told me what he remembered you wearing so we went looking for you. As the car is blue we figured we would find you at the Zetas store and ID 77 pointed your car out to me about an hour into our patrol. After sticking around the area for quite a long time and questioning a bunch of people at the store that knew you IC (I wont disclose what they said as that was part of the reason I charged you but I can PM an admin with it if they need) I determined that  it was enough evidence to place a charge on your record and impound your vehicle. He didn't know it was you he only knew the vehicle and the clothes you were wearing.

While looking back on the situation as the officer investigating what ID 77 told me I should of gathered more evidence before placing charges. But at the time I was pretty confident it was indeed you who did the cirme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Thank you for your patience while this report was under review.

After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, I have decided to deny this report for the following reason(s):

  • The reported party seems to have done excessive research ICly. Their story adds up, your charges were placed about 14 hours after the incident. I find this to be more of an IC incident than an act of Metagaming. Therefore I will not be issuing any punishments.

    If you feel you've been done wrong/they had insufficient evidence ICly you could use IC means to combat this.

This decision is final. Unless instructed to, if you post another player report pertaining to this incident, you may be muted from posting on the forums for a temporary period. If you disagree with the outcome of this report, please file an appeal following the appeal guidelines and format.

Moderator YuSoHelpful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.