Jump to content

DrPathetic

Moderator
  • Posts

    575
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DrPathetic

  1. Public records being available would be a neat addition to be honest, to both civilian and criminal rp. Or at least on a by-request basis handled by the government but I think that'd be more of an IC thing anyway. There might need to be a little script support for this but I think we could probably get something like this made available if gone through the government so I'd personally recommend going through those channels to see if it's something they're interested in doing. Overall +1
  2. REPORT ACCEPTED ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, we've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following player(s): Vincent_Diaz (28) - Punishments for NonRP From the footage given, it can be seen you are robbing someone who, at the time, was a new player. This is a direct violation of Rule 15. One cannot steal from players with NEW PLAYER above their head unless they have deliberately taken part in an active crime scene in which protection is temporarily lost. And since there was no demonstration of any crim being committed by the new player you are receiving this punishment. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Senior Support Ramo Senior Moderator DrPathetic
  3. PLAYER REPORT DENIED ―――――――――――――――――――――――――― Thank you for your patience while this report has been under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached, we have decided to deny this report for a variety of reasons I'll explain below: I'd like to start this explanation off by talking about the initial demands by Samuel_Colonna: "Do not move or you get shot" & "You get out, we open fire". These initial blanket demands were highly unrealistic coming from a cop in the middle of public, no real law enforcement would threaten to gun down people for the sole reason of exiting a building. Whether you actually intended to shoot or not would have been IC of course but these demands are not valid in terms of the FearRP accusations as none of the individuals inside the bank were under direct danger when they were being shouted. These demands had one purpose, to stop people leaving the bank because it was clear that if they came out, they severely outnumbered you and had an advantage. Generic demands given to a crowd like this just hinder any choices being made from those inside and giving demands to a crowd of people is just not valid. Secondly, I'd like to talk about why you issued these blanket demands at 11 people in the first place. In Ace_Rellet's statement he spoke about how you were surveying the area when witnessing suspicious activity and then witnessed the 9 (actually 11) bikes pull up and begin the robbery. At this stage they had no idea you were there and instead of waiting for the backup that was called, 2 of you went in severely outnumbered in hope to place them all under FearRP at the same time to halt the robbery and whilst instigating the situation. This was a poor IC decision that you then paid for by all of them running out at the same time and taking advantage of how much they outnumber you. If there was more police outside then more people would have been placed under FearRP and the situation might have gone more like you hoped. Thirdly, the second set of demands over VoiP. These demands issued by the reporting party at closer range, directly to people, were indeed valid. And the people they were valid to acknowledged this and complied appropriately. In fact, someone returned to the scene specifically for that. Overall, this was not a breach of FearRP and in a situation where it was effectively 2 PD officers (as Ace was late, very far back, and not issuing any demands to anyone that could hear) vs 11 gang members robbing a bank, you were lucky to get the 4 people you did and to expect the group to not take advantage of their only way out and their numbers is an unfair expectation. The initial demands given portray a very poor win-fast mentality that limits roleplay and I hope to not see them come up again in a situation to make up for under-preparing and not waiting for backup. As for the claims made by the reported parties about LSPD 'camping' the bank, It is clear they witnessed unusual activity from your group and acted accordingly to keep surveying the area to see why members were scouting the bank. Also, the shots fired were not an issue and appear to just be a sync issue as nobody was shot at. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. This report is now locked and archived. Regards, Sr Moderator DrPathetic, Sr Support Arrta & Sr Support NotMattch
  4. +1 If that's too much then maybe each month you have vip you get a new walk style for free would be pretty neat
  5. PENDING RESPONSE ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story: [Notified In-Game] - Vincent_Diaz (28) - Please explain your point of view in regard to the reported situation and provide any evidence that you may have. If the requested player(s) do not respond within 24 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Senior Moderator DrPathetic
  6. PLAYER REPORT DENIED ―――――――――――――――――――――――――― Thank you for your patience while this report has been under review. After reviewing this report and the evidence attached, I have decided to deny this report for the following reason(s): From the supplied evidence it is difficult to pinpoint who actually shot first, however, the reported parties were running at them with guns out in a drug lab and it is very clear that both parties were immediately hostile to each other upon meeting at the lab. What I recommend for all players involved is to refresh yourself with the DM rule as the main cause for this confusion are the callouts made on the radio on both sides. It is down to you and you alone to know and have evidence of whether you have DM rights on the opposing party and this confusion could have been avoided if several people did not just take the word of one person on the radio as gospel as one person on one of the sides was obviously mistaken when they thought the opposition shot first. This report could have been very close to resulting in a deathmatching punishment for one of the parties. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. This report is now locked and archived. Regards, Senior Moderator DrPathetic & Senior Support Ramo
  7. REPORT ACCEPTED ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, we've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following player(s): Layne_Jenkins (67) - Punishments for FearRP From the footage given, it can be seen you completely disregarded the instructions given to you when you were under gunpoint by several heavy weapons and elected to keep attempting to start your vehicle and drive off. This is a breach of the FearRP rule and shows a disregard for your characters life. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Senior Support Gataki Senior Moderator DrPathetic
  8. REPORT ACCEPTED ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, we've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following player(s): Samuel_Cappek (33) - Punishments for NonRP & DeathMatching From the footage given, it can be seen you attacked people without a valid reason, as well as attempted a robbery in a public location. This is a breach of the NonRP robbery rule as well as DeathMatching. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Senior Support SirQubed Senior Moderator DrPathetic
  9. @surg3yy Cease the back and forth responses to other peoples replies please
  10. @DraskMortoYou need to press F2 to bring up your mouse and click it. Let me know if this is possible.
  11. REPORT ACCEPTED ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and evidence attached to it, we've decided to accept this report and issue the punishments to the following player(s): Kentrell_Williams (53) - Punishments for NonRP (Powergaming) From the footage given, it can be seen you searched the vehicle and took the bag as the reporting party unlocked it and got on with no rp to make this a fair interaction, especially when realistically, grabbing the bag during that interaction wouldn't have been as easy as it was. If you have received a punishment that you disagree with, feel free to file a punishment appeal following the punishment appeal guidelines and format. If the reporting party suffered a loss greater than $25,000 in value, feel free to file a refund request following the refund request guidelines and format. Regards, Senior Support Ramo Senior Moderator DrPathetic
  12. PENDING RESPONSE ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story: [Notified In-Game] - Layne_Jenkins (67) - Please explain your point of view in regard to the reported situation and provide any evidence that you may have. In addition, we'd like you to answer the following question(s): - Can you explain why in the supplied evidence you appear to keep attempting to start your vehicle when it was stalled and you were under gunpoint and given direct instructions to stop trying to turn it on and get out? If the requested player(s) do not respond within 24 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Senior Moderator DrPathetic
  13. PENDING RESPONSE ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― After reviewing this report and the evidence attached to it, we have decided that this report cannot be concluded at this time. We would like to receive a response from the following player(s) to explain their side of the story: [Notified In-Game] - Kentrell_Williams (53) - Can you please explain your side of the story and provide any evidence you may have? If the requested player(s) do not respond within 24 hours, this report will be concluded based on the evidence that has already been provided, to the best of our ability. Regards, Senior Moderator DrPathetic
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.